Your reality could look like this.
A governed decision layer does not replace your team. It handles the repetitive readiness check so their judgment lands on accounts that can actually move.
Work the right inventory
Accounts are routed into the right recovery lane before specialist time is spent. No queue triage, no duplicate review.
Catch blockers early
Missing contract support, notification proof, carrier details, or benchmark evidence are surfaced immediately, not mid-appeal.
Standardize specialist judgment
The same account gets the same readiness decision every time, with a clear reason and a rule trace you can audit.
Four steps from account packet to next action.
Everything LogicPearl returns is tied to a rule you can inspect and a source document it read.
Read the account packet
LogicPearl ingests normalized facts from your current systems, documents, and workflow tools. No ETL project.
Select the right lane
It determines whether the account belongs in denials, payment variance, NSA, VA/TRICARE, or workers’ comp / MVA.
Check readiness
It evaluates whether the evidence and timing support action now, or whether the account is blocked on specific support.
Return the decision
Your team gets status, missing items, next action, and a traceable reason, back in the workbench they already use.
Click an account. Watch the decision change.
Every account below is evaluated through the actual compiled LogicPearl rule artifact for its recovery lane, running as WebAssembly in your browser. Flip the evidence and the answer really changes.
Each lane artifact (pearl.wasm + metadata) is fetched once then evaluated locally. The same signed artifact ships into production via the Rust native binary, server-side Wasm, or REST. The decision does not drift.
One decision format. Any recovery lane.
The five lanes below are representative shapes we use in the demo. Each asks a different business question and trips on a different blocker. Your production lanes are compiled the same way, against your actual workflow, and always return the answer in this shape.
What your specialist actually sees.
Operational first. The readiness call, the missing item, the recommended action, all visible before any rule-engine detail. The machinery is one click away, not in the way.
- Lane, status, priority: visible at a glance
- Missing item called out by name, not by rule ID
- Plain-English explanation, expandable to rule trace
- Source documents linked for every fired check
You already run AI in recovery. LogicPearl is the deterministic layer beside it.
Modern recovery teams run RAG, document extraction, and LLM summarization across their inventory. That gets you more context per account. It does not get you a defensible, repeatable readiness decision. LogicPearl runs alongside those AI pipelines and contributes one governed, auditable answer per account.
You’ve invested in the models. The gap is a deterministic layer beside them.
- Context, not decisionLLM summarizes the account; the specialist still has to decide ready / blocked themselves.
- Prompt drift between teamsTwo analysts ask the same model the same question and get two different framings of the answer.
- No audit trail on the callYou can see which chunks were retrieved, not which policy clause made the account un-workable today.
- Payer / contract updates don’t propagateA new amendment lands; RAG picks it up eventually, but no one knows which accounts just changed status.
- Hallucination risk on the recommendationThe model will cheerfully suggest an appeal path the timely-filing window already closed on.
Same AI pipelines. One auditable, deterministic answer alongside them.
- Decision, not just contextReturns ready / needs-support / blocked with a named next action, not a paragraph the analyst has to interpret.
- Deterministic policy checksEvidence gates and timing windows are rules, not prompts. Same account → same answer, every run.
- Source-grounded rule traceEvery call cites the clause, the document page, and the extracted field the model pulled it from.
- Payer updates propagate on rolloutEdit a rule, preview impact across current inventory, ship with a signed version bump.
- Hallucination-boundedLLMs read and extract. Rules decide. The model cannot suggest an action outside a governed playbook.
Keep your AI stack. Add a governed decision partner beside it.
Today, an LLM reads policy chunks and guesses readiness. With LogicPearl working alongside your AI, the LLM does what it's best at (pulling typed fields out of documents) and the rule engine decides. Your extraction models keep their job; a deterministic partner handles the verdict. No retrieval hallucinations in the decision path.
Ask “what would have happened if …?” and get an answer.
Because every decision is a rule trace, not a prompt, LogicPearl can replay any account under different evidence, thresholds, or policy versions. No re-running the model. No guessing.
What would you want a pilot to prove?
There is no single pilot shape we push. Tell us what you would want to see demonstrated, whether that is a specific lane, a specific outcome, a specific payer, or a specific jurisdiction, and we will scope the narrowest test that would actually answer it.
Scoping call
30 minutes. You walk us through one recovery lane that hurts today. We learn what data lives where.
Data-fit review
We look at a sample of de-identified accounts together and tell you honestly what we can and can’t decide from the fields you have.
Shadow run
LogicPearl runs silently alongside your team on real inventory. Readiness calls are logged, not acted on.
Compare & decide
Side-by-side: our readiness call vs. your team’s action vs. the actual recovery outcome. You decide whether to keep going.